The professional reference for Queensland real estate agents A publication by Shaka.deal
Get Paid at Settlement

What Is Warranty in Queensland Real Estate? Definition and Agent Guide

What Is Warranty in Queensland Real Estate? Definition and Agent Guide

A seller warranty in a Queensland contract of sale is a statement of fact made by the seller at the time of signing, confirming specifics about the property’s title, condition, and compliance with relevant laws and authority requirements. It is not a marketing claim or a negotiating position — it is a contractual assertion on which the buyer is entitled to rely. When a seller signs the REIQ contract, they are making binding representations about what they own, what encumbrances exist, and what the property is, right now, at the moment of exchange. Getting those representations wrong is not a technicality. It creates liability.


How Warranty Works in Queensland Real Estate

Queensland operates on a “warranty” system, whereby when entering into a standard contract of sale, a seller provides certain warranties under the Building Act 1975, the Planning Act 2016, and other relevant legislation. These warranties are limited to government or authority-issued notices, threatened litigation, and land contamination. For everything outside those categories — the physical condition of the building, undisclosed structural concerns, or the lawfulness of alterations — it is the responsibility of the buyer to investigate and ascertain, as part of their building and pest and due diligence conditions.

This is the foundational logic of the Queensland system: seller warranties define a narrow but enforceable floor of factual disclosure, while the broader risk of physical condition is pushed to the buyer through contractual conditions. It is a different posture to New South Wales and Victoria, where vendor disclosure obligations are considerably broader before exchange. In Queensland, a real estate agent is authorised to draft and issue a contract of sale — whereas in other states, real estate agents are not authorised to draft contracts, that being a task that can only be performed by a legal professional. That makes Queensland agents directly responsible for ensuring the warranty section of every contract they prepare is accurate and complete.

Standard seller warranties in the REIQ contract have the seller confirming things like ownership of the property, capacity to settle the contract, and the absence of unsatisfied judgments, orders, or writs affecting the property. These are the baseline assertions every seller makes, regardless of property type. A seller warrants that they are the registered owner, capable of completing the sale, and that there are no undisclosed legal issues affecting the property, such as enforcement notices or pending claims. If any of those assertions turns out to be false at the time of signing, the warranty has been breached — and the consequences flow immediately from the contract itself.

The Distinction Between Contractual and Statutory Warranties

It is important for agents to understand that warranties in a Queensland property transaction operate at two distinct levels: those embedded within the standard contract terms, and those imposed by statute. A statutory warranty is a promise that a seller gives under statute about certain matters — for example, that there are no hidden defects or liabilities that are not disclosed. The two categories are not interchangeable, and each carries its own remedies upon breach.

The contractual warranties are those found within the body of the REIQ contract itself — the seller’s confirmations about title, encumbrances, and compliance. The statutory warranties, by contrast, are imposed by legislation irrespective of what the contract says. For strata and community title properties, section 223 of the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (Qld) (BCCM Act) is the operative provision.


Why Warranty Matters for Queensland Agents

The breach of seller warranties triggers specific rights under the standard REIQ contract. There may also be additional rights available to a buyer outside of the contract itself — for instance, if a statutory obligation is also breached. This dual exposure is something agents often underestimate. A warranty breach is not simply a contractual dispute between buyer and seller; where the breach also engages a legislative obligation, the remedies available to the buyer are potentially broader and more serious.

A buyer’s rights will depend on which warranty is breached, as different remedies apply to different warranties. At one end of the scale, the buyer will only be entitled to terminate the contract and walk away with their deposit — for example, where an order had been made affecting the property, contrary to the seller’s warranty. At the other end of the scale, the buyer may be entitled to sue the seller for compensation — for example, where the seller is aware the property is contaminated.

The agent’s role in this dynamic is significant. When listing a property for sale in Queensland, an owner needs only to engage an agent — and it is the agent who is authorised to draft and issue the contract of sale. That drafting responsibility is not ceremonial. An agent who prepares a contract with a warranty section left blank, or who accepts a seller’s assurances without checking obvious inconsistencies, is contributing directly to the risk of a warranty breach being discovered post-exchange. That outcome destabilises the transaction, damages the client relationship, and can implicate the agent’s professional conduct obligations under the Property Occupations Act 2014 (Qld).

Early collaboration between the seller, agent, and conveyancer reduces risk for both the seller and the agent. That collaboration is not optional best practice — it is the minimum standard of care that protects everyone involved in the transaction, including the agent’s own professional indemnity position.


Warranty in Body Corporate and Strata Properties: The Section 223 Framework

Nowhere are warranty obligations more detailed — or more commonly mishandled — than in the sale of lots within community titles schemes. For existing lots, the seller must provide a section 206 disclosure statement under the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (Qld) before the buyer signs. The seller also gives statutory warranties under section 223 of the BCCM Act in the contract.

Under section 223, the seller warrants that the body corporate records do not disclose any defects in the common property or body corporate assets other than those arising through fair wear and tear; that to the seller’s knowledge there are no actual, contingent or expected liabilities of the body corporate that are not part of its normal operating expenses other than those disclosed in the contract; and that to the seller’s knowledge, there are no circumstances other than those disclosed in the contract in relation to the affairs of the body corporate likely to materially prejudice the buyer.

In the REIQ contract released from August 2025, sellers of units and townhouses are required to make a series of statutory warranties directly within the contract itself. On page five of the contract, the seller must confirm certain things about the body corporate, such as whether there are known defects or liabilities. Previously, this information appeared in the body corporate disclosure statement, often completed by the body corporate manager. Under the new regime, those statutory warranties have been moved into the contract, which means real estate agents — who usually prepare contracts — must now ensure this section is completed correctly.

This structural change carries a direct consequence for agents. Statutory warranties are not dealt with in the Seller Disclosure Statement given to the buyer before signing. A seller cannot simply say “refer to disclosure statement” for statutory warranties about the body corporate or common property. If they do, or leave the warranty section of the contract blank, the law says the seller is actually giving the buyer a warranty that there is nothing about the complex that needs to be advised to the buyer.

That is a significant trap. An empty table in the warranty section of a body corporate contract is not a neutral omission — it is treated by the legislation as a positive affirmation that there are no issues. This section of the contract should not be left blank. It is important that each item is completed accurately and in full. Where there are known issues, they must be described. If there is not enough room, include the full details in a separate annexure, and reference that annexure number in the warranty section.

Termination Rights on Breach of Body Corporate Statutory Warranty

If the seller breaches a statutory warranty under the BCCM Act, the buyer may terminate the contract within 14 days of receiving the contract for an existing lot, or no later than 3 days before settlement for a proposed lot. The deposit would also be returned to the buyer. As such, to ensure the transaction proceeds smoothly, it is important to provide full disclosure before the contract is signed.

A 14-day termination window is a live risk in any body corporate contract where the warranty section has not been properly completed. It is the kind of late-stage collapse that no amount of good negotiation recovers from.


What Queensland Agents Need to Know About Warranty

The practical implications for agents in daily practice come down to three operating principles: accuracy before execution, collaboration throughout, and vigilance on body corporate contracts specifically.

Accuracy before execution means treating the warranty section of the contract as a factual checklist requiring verification, not a formality to be signed away. For sellers, it is important to ensure the standard warranties are accurate for the property — otherwise they should be amended. An agent who simply hands a contract to a seller and says “sign here” without walking through the warranty confirmations has not met the standard of care the drafting role demands. If the seller discloses a pending council notice, an unsatisfied judgment, or a known body corporate dispute, those must be reflected in the contract — not left out on the basis that the buyer can find them later.

Collaboration throughout means involving a conveyancer or solicitor at the right point in the process. If the seller does not know enough about their property to complete the statutory warranty section of the contract, a search to inspect the records of the body corporate should be undertaken. That search takes time. Request relevant body corporate information early and build the processing timeframe into your sales timetable to avoid delays. Agents who rush contracts to exchange without giving sellers time to verify body corporate matters are creating problems that land back on the transaction at the worst possible moment.

Vigilance on body corporate contracts reflects the fact that the section 223 framework is the area of highest warranty risk for agents in Queensland right now. The 2025 changes to the REIQ contract moved significant warranty obligations directly into the body of the contract that agents prepare. Whether you are a seller, agent, or buyer, understanding these warranties — and getting them right — is critical to avoid potential disputes.

For agents working with interstate or international buyers — a consistent segment of the Queensland market, particularly in South East Queensland and the Gold and Sunshine Coasts — it is worth noting that the Queensland warranty model differs materially from what those buyers may know from their home states. Buyers from New South Wales or Victoria, accustomed to receiving extensive vendor disclosure before exchange, may not fully appreciate that QLD warranties are narrower and that the burden of investigating physical condition rests with them. Explaining this distinction clearly is part of the agent’s professional service, not just the conveyancer’s.

It is also worth noting that the standard REIQ contract expressly states that the seller does not warrant that the present use of the property is lawful. This is a point that catches buyers — particularly investors intending to use the property for short-term accommodation, commercial purposes, or a use that differs from the current approved use. The absence of a warranty on lawful use is not an oversight in the contract. It is a deliberate allocation of risk that buyers need to investigate for themselves, typically through a planning certificate and a review of the applicable local government planning scheme.


What This Means for Queensland Agents

Warranty in Queensland real estate is not a passive disclosure — it is a factual assertion that carries legal weight from the moment the contract is executed. The standard REIQ contract embeds seller warranties about title, capacity, and legal encumbrances. For community title properties, section 223 of the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (Qld) adds a further layer of statutory warranties that now sit directly within the contract body and must be completed accurately by the agent.

The key practical realities for agents are:

For buyers, it is important to test the accuracy of the seller’s warranties by undertaking searches and being ready to take any necessary action. For agents, the corresponding obligation is ensuring their seller has given them accurate information to begin with — and that the contract reflects reality. A well-prepared contract protects the seller, protects the buyer, and protects the agent’s professional standing. That is the practical value of getting seller warranty in Queensland right.

Powered by Shaka.deal

Split your conjunction commission on-chain. Instant. Irrevocable.

Queensland.estate is a publication by Shaka.deal — an on-chain payment routing tool that lets Queensland agents route commission splits to multiple wallets simultaneously at settlement. 1% fee.

Get Paid at Settlement →